Currency strength,
as institutions see it

Eight major currencies. Four timeframes. BIS 2025 volume-weighted. XGBoost conviction scoring. Updated every H1 bar from a live MT5 feed — the methodology made real.

Loading...
How to read this ↓
Live Dashboard
WA-RSI Currency Strength Strongest → Weakest · hover for timeframe breakdown
0 Weak 25 50 Neutral 75 100 Strong
Loading live data...
ML Signals
Top Conviction Trades Above threshold · ranked by conviction
Loading signals...
The Journey

From concept to running system

I
Act I · The Question
Multi-Timeframe, Volume-Weighted Currency Strength

How do institutions measure currency strength? Not equally — volume-weighted across timeframes. The BIS 2025 data provides the weighting. Four timeframes provide the horizon.

Read Article #2 →
II
Act II · The Proof
When Good Signals Aren't Good Enough — The Conviction Gap

WA-RSI divergence identifies pairs. XGBoost trained on 122,640 bars converts that divergence into a calibrated conviction score. Not every signal is worth acting on.

Read Article #3 →
III
Act III · The System
CoreFX — Eight currencies. Four timeframes. Running now.

The methodology is live. CoreFX Engine EA computes WA-RSI from your broker feed. CoreFX ML scores conviction. The signals above update every H1 bar.

You are here
Guide

How to read the dashboard

The WA-RSI scale runs from 0 to 100. 50 is neutral — neither strength nor weakness. The further a currency is from 50, the stronger the directional signal.

The bars
WA-RSI reading — 0 to 100

Each bar represents a currency's Weighted Average RSI across H1, H4, D1 and W1 timeframes, scaled by its BIS 2025 global FX turnover share. Green bars above 50 indicate strength. Red bars below 50 indicate weakness. Bars near 50 are neutral — no clear bias.

The tooltip
Timeframe breakdown on hover

Hovering a currency bar shows the individual RSI reading on each of the four timeframes (H1, H4, D1, W1) and the currency's BIS weight. When all four timeframes align in the same direction, the signal has the highest structural conviction.

The conviction score
ML probability — 0 to 100%

The XGBoost model produces a calibrated probability that the currency pair will move in the indicated direction over the next H1 bar. Only pairs above the per-currency conviction threshold are shown. Higher conviction indicates stronger model agreement across the ensemble.

The pair signals
Strong vs Weak — the conviction trade

Top conviction pairs are derived by pairing the strongest currency against the weakest where both legs have directional ML signals. The pair conviction score is the minimum of both legs — conservative by design. Only signals above threshold are shown.

Methodology

What drives the numbers

The calculation behind every bar and every signal.

Timeframe Weights

Four timeframes, each carrying a different analytical role. The weekly chart dominates — it captures the structural trend that institutional desks position around.

H1 Intraday trigger · immediate momentum 30%
H4 Session-level trend · primary signal 35%
D1 Daily directional bias 20%
W1 Veto bias · contra-trend suppression 15%
WA-RSI =
(H1 × 0.30) + (H4 × 0.35) + (D1 × 0.20) + (W1 × 0.15)
scaled by BIS 2025 volume weight, normalised across 8 currencies
BIS 2025 Volume Weights

Not all currencies trade with equal weight. The BIS Triennial Survey 2025 provides the actual global FX turnover share for each currency — the signal is weighted accordingly.

USD
89.2%
EUR
28.9%
JPY
17.3%
GBP
12.9%
AUD
6.4%
CAD
6.2%
CHF
5.0%
NZD
2.7%

BIS shares sum above 200% as each transaction involves two currencies.

Financial Disclaimer This dashboard is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing displayed here constitutes financial advice, investment recommendations, or a solicitation to trade. Currency strength readings are analytical tools, not signals to act upon. Trading financial instruments involves substantial risk of loss. Data is sourced from MT5 broker feeds via the CoreFX Engine EA — figures reflect broker quotes and may differ from other sources. Past performance is not indicative of future results.